Sexual Objectification
I wanted to post only after I finished up my new layout for the website (for some reason, it’s a brilliant shade of purple), but there’s this really pressing issue that’s been on my mind for some time, specifically the issue of sexual objectification. For all my feminist foot-stomping and expressions of disgust at how males have managed to internalize such notions, the same can be said for females, quite frankly.
Female-oriented (or any least, populated) communities seem to be the worst offenders of this. Any photo of a male celebrity would always be followed up with someone saying ‘I’d hit that’ and another swarm of other females agreeing, openly discussing their sexual fantasies with each other (also, Yahtzee). No one calls them on it, and yet these very females get on cases where males start saying the exact same things when presented with a female celebrity.
Of course, the usual arguments can be thrown around – females have every right to boggle at men’s bodies, females have had a history of oppression so we’re entitled to have revenge, the guys can do it so WHAI CANT I – but this isn’t about gender equality. This is about sexual objectification, in and of itself, employed by both genders. I personally find sexual objectification abhorrent, in all forms, male or female. I don’t support one or the other, and yes, I do condone my gender for it.
Just because women has had a history of oppression doesn’t mean we can subscribe to the same things men did. Frankly, I don’t think that this is even a valid psychological reason for the sudden surge of male objectification – it’s just another kneejerk “politically correct” answer as to why female objectification is condoned and yet male objectification is accepted. I frankly don’t think feministic revenge goes through the minds of 15 year olds when typing out ‘I WANT TO DO BAD THINGS TO THIS MAN’ on the Internet.
Perhaps the female sex drive was greater than I assumed. Perhaps I did subscribe to some form of projection bias; I don’t see the sexual attraction in men, I don’t gush on end, and therefore the rest of the female population have the same beliefs as I do. I’m wrong, obviously, but that doesn’t make sexual objectification any more right.
Should men be honoured by their sexual objectification status in the female community? With the evidence that men think about sex more often than females, it feels like men wouldn’t be as insulted as women are. But I’m not a man, so I don’t know. Maybe Johnny Depp does take comfort knowing that he’s in the sexual fantasies of prepubescent girls everywhere.
Moral Relativism
Having someone call me a ‘moralfag’ the other day made me wonder about my position on moral relativism. I’ve always held the position that nothing is inherently good or evil – it completely depends on the social situation and culture. Gwen and I had a pretty long discussion about that for her Philosophy 101 class, and she was arguing on the side of absolutism while I was on relativism. The people who interviewed me at SMU a long time ago were also Not Happy on my views of relativism. They mentioned something about paedophilia but in my anxiety, I cannot remember what nonsense I spouted in defense of relativism.
Anyway, there was an argument raised against moral relativism that I read about quite recently. Abolishment of slavery can be considered moral progress, but according to relativist theory, Lincoln was a bad man, because he acted against the cultural norms of his era.
I’m not quite sure what to think of this. Lincoln was unpopular in the South at the time, and he was certainly seen as a bad man for freeing slaves. Right now we see abolishment of slavery as moral progress, but that itself lends to the argument that morals are relative in differing cultures (or eras).
Consider the reasons why slavery is a bad thing. It subjugates an entire race; it inflicts pain and suffering; it results in social classes; it causes discrimination. Yet, all these can be argued. Stereotyping, prejudice and discrimination are automatic processes in our brains, and it is the social norms that prevent us from actively discriminating. The obligatory question is then ‘why is discrimination a bad thing’? Why do we consider equality as important? If equality is so important, why aren’t we all turning Communist? Why did countries that adopted Communism fail, then? This then lends itself to the even bigger question of the social structures in any given country and the psychology of people… which is mind-boggling, frankly.
What is more concrete, however, is pain and suffering. Pain is the body’s way of telling to GET THE FUCK OUT OF WHATEVER YOU’RE DOING (BDSM not included). It’s then quite natural that removing human-inflicted suffering from an entire race of people is considered ‘good’.
If so, then isn’t there some things that are inherently good? Removing pain is good, inflicting pain is bad? The body that reacts negatively to something (universally) is considered bad? However, pain doesn’t quite answer the morals of more abstract things, like copyright infringement… and other things that doesn’t cause physical damage.
I get the feeling that copyright infringement or theft of property hearkens back to the ages when food was scarce, and people had to barter for goods. Any sort of theft meant a lower chance of survival. I’m sure this is pretty much the evolutionary theory of something, and any type of evolutionary theory, in my experience, is a load of hogwash.
Are constructs of the human mind then supposed to be considered morally good or bad? Are there things that everyone in the entire world universally share? Expression of feelings, like smiling and anger, seem to be shared by many different cultures and are considered universal… does the same go for moral values?
Anyway, I should read up more on moral relativism. I shouldn’t be so clueless about this when I’m in support of it.
